Debora MacKenzie of New Sci vs conservationists

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
  • #3339
    Martin W

      A v curious opinion piece just out by New Scientist writer Debora MacKenzie, who has done news items on wild birds supposedly spreading H5N1 – including a piece in which “New Scientist can reveal” wild ducks carried H5N1 to Nigeria, even though this was pure speculation, and evidence showed poultry smuggling – or even transfer via vets – was responsible.

      This is lopsided piece, based on flimsy evidence – wild ducks that survive H5N1, for which only tiny evidence – and ignoring much, including absence of H5N1 in migratory birds in east Asia since last summer. (In an email to me, DM suggested can’ t prove absence, which is a v curious notion; likewise, can’t prove beings from outer space haven’t been involved in spreading H5N1, etc.)

      Here’s the piece; below it, a couple of emails I’d earlier sent DM – for yes, I’m among the bird conservationists who had emailed her. Arguments in these remain valid, seems she – like so many Tooth Fairy Bird Believers – has her story, and is sticking to it no matter the facts.

      Bird lovers in denial
      It’s clear that wild birds are spreading the H5N1 virus, so why do some
      bird experts still refuse to acknowledge it, asks Debora MacKenzie

      MOST of us, at some time in our lives, have refused to believe something
      we don’t want to believe despite considerable evidence that it is true.
      Such denial is understandable; the truth can be painful. But there are
      times when denial can also be dangerous. The reluctance of some
      ornithologists, conservationists and other members of the birding
      community to accept the role of wild birds in spreading HSN1 bird flu is
      a striking example.

      Since I wrote in this magazine some eight months ago that wild birds
      appeared to be carrying the H5N1 flu virus, I have received dozens of
      critical, sarcastic, even vicious emails from such people. How can you
      spread this ludicrous theory, they ask. Why is New Scientist protecting
      the poultry industry? Where’s the evidence that wild birds have been
      helping the virus spread?

      Let’s summarise the evidence.
      The H5N1 virus emerged and acquired its nastiness in poultry; there’s no
      dispute about that. The trade in poultry is also overwhelmingly
      responsible for H5N1’s spread in east Asia. It was a different story,
      however, when the virus, having killed wild geese at Qinghai Lake in
      China, spread across Russia and into Turkey, Ukraine and Romania. The
      strain found in all these places is identical to the one first seen at
      Qinghai, never in east Asian poultry, which strongly suggests that it
      was not carried west by poultry. Maps of the outbreaks look a lot like
      the migration maps of dabbling ducks – long-distance migrators that
      tolerate the virus.
      [See below: e Asian poultry not fully sampled; migration routes don’t fit; evidence dabbling ducks tolerate the virus not so strong or straightforward, evidence they can transmit to others is lacking – indeed, evidence fron wild is to contrary. Note absense in e Asian migrants recently.]

      Since then the evidence has become even clearer. There have been
      outbreaks in western Europe almost exclusively in wild birds, and in all
      cases of bird flu west of Qinghai the virus is identical, suggesting it
      has found a carrier where it is more stable than in chickens. Yet the
      critics refuse to listen. They tend to start with the conclusion that
      wild birds must never be blamed, and then marshal “evidence” to support
      their case, ignoring any that doesn’t. Wild birds are being made
      scapegoats for a disease that evolved on battery farms, they say;
      they’re the victims, not the vector – ignoring the fact that they can be
      both. Or they invoke alternative explanations and demand they be
      disproved: the virus found in birds in a German nature reserve could
      have got there in Turkish chicken waste used as fertiliser, rather than
      ducks migrating from Siberia.
      [Notion of a “stable” virus that kills its hosts is contradictory; here, shows DM hasn’t the slightest inkling of natural selection and diseases: evolutionary biology]

      Some have come round to the idea that the virus is being carried by wild
      birds, but others are still in denial. This month we heard hopeful
      claims that because the spring migration across the northern hemisphere
      has not been accompanied by an explosion of bird flu, no wild birds are
      carrying the virus. Yet everything scientists know about bird flu
      epidemiology indicates that this is not surprising: it’s likely that a
      few infected birds have arrived at their summer locations, that over the
      coming months they will infect others, and that prevalence will peak in
      the autumn.
      [a “few infected birds”? why is this likely?]

      I am not the only one concerned about all this. “The ornithology
      community has been slow to acknowledge that wild birds might be playing
      some role,” says one senior European virologist. A top American
      virologist who himself resisted the evidence about wild birds admitted:
      “It’s a political debate, not science.” A UN official told me: “They
      aren’t speaking from evidence.”
      [a supposedly respectable magazine quoting only anonymous sources?
      Ornithology community not slow to acknowledge; some readily acknowledged, but over time, increasing belief wild birds not key vectors H5N1. If not about science, why so many facts ignored in this opinion piece?]

      Their attitude could have consequences for how we tackle the spread
      of H5N1. We need birding experts to predict where the virus might
      migrate next, rather than deny that it will. The influence of birders is
      said to underlie the British government’s decision not to force poultry
      farmers to keep their birds inside. If nothing else, wild birds are
      indeed victims of this virus, and their advocates should be fighting to
      protect them from it, not denying it is there.

      Ask birders why they are scared of implicating wild birds and they’ll
      say it encourages people to cull them and undermines conservation
      efforts. It’s true that some people worried about bird flu have
      threatened to shoot birds or destroy wetlands, but as far as I have been
      able to discover nothing much has materialised.

      I’m sceptical that this is the real reason. A clue as to what this
      might be emerged in April at the first, hastily arranged World Migratory
      Bird Day in Nairobi, Kenya, which was described by its conservationist
      organisers as happening “at a time when migratory birds are being
      unfairly portrayed solely as the harbingers of death and disease” – an
      absurdly exaggerated claim. Another critic said: “The real question is
      not, are wild birds to blame, but why are wild birds being blamed?” In
      other words, this isn’t about evaluating evidence, it’s about building

      The only reason I can think of for all this is that we are dealing
      with a community acting more on faith and emotion than reason. For them,
      birds are, by definition, innately pure and transcendent – too pure to
      carry anything as mundane or dirty as a virus. Given this attitude you
      can understand their denial, but they are doing neither wild birds nor
      humans any favours.

      I’ve tried emailing Debora MacKenzie several times.

      Here’s one example, after she had tried rebutting arguments by Nial Moores and me:

      Thanks for the email; glad you are willing to look at this in some detail.

      However, your argument is not solid.
      And, curiously, you ignore the absence of H5N1 across a swathe of land, from Iran east to Japan, where most of north Asia’s waterbirds winter, yet there are no outbreaks in migratory wetland birds.
      Hong Kong is a notable site here: has some 50,000 waterbirds, including pintail (garganey pass through on migration): not one healthy wild bird has tested positive, among over 16,000 [by some reports; PNAS for some reason gives 13,000 I think, without re-checking.] Currently getting H5N1 in birds, inc poultry; maybe after higher poultry demand at Chinese New Year; and mentioning this, seen report that Nigerian smuggling can increase around Hajj.
      Hong Kong is at a crossroads for migrants in southern China, right at the epicentre of H5N1 outbreaks. Had H6N1 in birds, inc two urban parks (ornamental waterfowl, at least 2 wild little egrets, which likely residents). So, blithely ignoring not easy.

      Further, PNAS paper is overall strongly counter to ideas wild birds spread H5N1.
      Witness regional forms of H5N1: if wild birds could indeed carry and introduce to poultry (and do so readily), why do we see these?

      It seems curious logic to say poultry trade spreads over short distances, but wild birds over long range.
      There is long distance trade, inc smuggling – cf large batch of smuggled poultry from China arriving in Italy.

      “one detects the presence of the virus chiefly because it causes outbreaks in poultry if the wild birds contact them”
      – wild birds contact poultry? Where? [maybe it does happen in Nigeria – but people hunt waterbirds there, so might figure wild birds avoid humans as much as possible]

      “The ducks themselves, at least those that made it through migration, dont die of it, so you wont see it that way.”
      – questionable; are ducks that die of it, plus can get significant death rates – very high in Qinghai – in birds sharing wetlands with them.

      “A very low prevalence of sampling, if there is even that, cannot prove absence,”
      No need for sampling at Qinghai – the virus made its presence very clearly known.
      Elsewhere, it is scarce or rare in wild; get some die-offs but need monitoring to find them..

      “Flu is highly contagious. It spreads from bird to bird.”
      Ah, now here’s an important one.
      You refer to “flu” – and make this rather casual statement. Regular wild bird flus do indeed seem highly contagious, among waterbirds (with caveats; seasonal changes, can get variations depending on bird type).
      But, evidence is that H5N1 in wild birds is not highly contagious. Qinghai the exception.
      But otherwise, we don’t see H5N1 readily spreading among wild birds. Hong Kong again – has had dead waterbirds found at/near wetland with the waterbirds, but no spread. (Just lately, a dead little egret a few km from Deep Bay.)
      Mongolia’s Erkhel – “the disease appeared self-limiting in wild birds”, researchers had to look hard to find it., and then o only in dead birds
      Thailand openbill storks – only few amongst large numbers of birds
      Romania: infected swans on ponds did not infect other waterbirds sharing ponds (this by lack of deaths, also as several of these birds tested)
      Romanian swans excreting low amounts of virus.
      Webster’s ducks with H5N1 that didn’t readily kill them likewise excreted low amounts; High amounts respiratory tracts – but ducks not prone to sneezing/French kissing.

      “Selling their birds off at market is what they are reportedly doing even now.”
      – so, do you think others with infected birds, or near infected birds, might have sold them off at markets? To people from non-infected areas.
      Nigeria had banned poultry imports; yet domestic demand surely still there. Surely tempting to smuggle in birds at bargain prices.

      “especially the Z genotype that has been responsible for virtually all commercial poultry outbreaks in east Asia”
      – This is the Z genotype. One of its variants, but it’s Z.

      ” birds at Poyang Lake in southeast China in March, some of which migrated to Qinghai.”
      – Which ones migrated this way?
      I know of none that migrate Poyang to Qinghai. I’ve studied some of the Poyang winter birds on migration along east coast of China (can be certain re Siberian cranes) – a long way from Qinghai.
      [I’ve asked Guan Yi and Robert Webster just which species they say migrated; so far, just told “migratory ducks”. Detail is important with virology; also important here re wild birds.]

      “timing of the outbreaks in Siberia, Turkey, the Black Sea and Nigeria exactly fit the known movements of some species”
      Not so with the timing of the outbreaks in Siberia.
      Link from Qinghai to Siberia doesn’t work: especially timing, in July, when birds from Qinghai not migrating north [many of geese flightless at this time]

      “They are kicking birds around because they are rural people, that is how that culture treats animals,”
      – how astonishingly patronising. I have seen rural people interacting with wild birds; maybe hunt n trap and so on, but never this.
      New Scientist not read there, perhaps, but New Sci taken as authoritative, reaches newspapers and other media

      “Were there geese, which do die of this virus, at Poyang as there were at Qinghai?”
      – Yes, many thousands, including much of world population of swan goose. Also geese, cranes etc. All sharing shallow wetlands, at high densities.

      “the Poyang and Qinghai viruses differ from any that have ever been seen in poultry in China.”
      By no means all poultry in China have been tested. Witness PNAS – north China, inc between Poyang and Qinghai, just a blank on the map. I’ve asked Guan Yi; they lack data.
      So, you are only making guesses re virus in poultry n China. The team found 4 distinct forms in mainland China (seen Guan mention 250 strains); how to be certain a form in north isn’t as per Qinghai?

      “The commercial transport of poultry should transport genotypes pretty much at random – smugglers dont genotype infected birds before they ship”
      – Why at random?
      If birds from n China to Russia/Kazakhstan, and then onwards by transport links such as railway – and the timings indeed fit this pattern too – would be same strain.

      “the only spread long distance so far has coincided with migratory pathways, “
      Not so; has been spread to Indonesia, Tibet (one case traced to poultry shipped 1500km, Lanzhou to Lhasa), more recently the spread to Russia and so on.
      Again, it baffles me why this notion re long distance spread by wild birds, short distance within poultry trade.
      This is not borne out by bulk of PNAS paper – notice re an introduction to Vietnam, evidently by transport from China.
      But, convenient for officials.
      [cf with foot n mouth; reached continent from UK – but there, no flying cows as convenient scapegoats]

      followed – after some more correspondence, inc as DM asking for ideas re bird species that may be impacted by H5N1 (her idea: by disease; my view is fear of the flu is more dangerous) by:

      Firstly, these “reservoir species” are mythical if considering wild species. I know you write of them; yet rather like the Tooth Fairy and so forth.

      (I spoke w Malik Peiris over phone here yesterday. Yes, his team has details re virology, but little more than arm-waving – as one of my lecturers would call it – re wild birds.
      Why should virus stay basically the same if spread by wild birds, especially when it kills so many of them? Instead, shouldn’t this lead to evolution?
      Whilst rapid spread by transport could surely lead to same virus strain being transported, and yet to evolve regional forms – Peiris acknowledged this is possible too.)

      Proven reservoir is poultry industry.
      We have loads of dead wild birds with h5n1, hardly any apparently healthy ones with it. When something is so hard to find, and leaves so little evidence of its presence, indeed Tooth Fairy like.

      Huge extrapolation from a few birds – which at Poyang were six ducks with two genotypes; I’d love to know what bird flu situation in surrounding poultry was. Also re the dead wild birds there. And re H5N1 across north China.
      Yes, also ducks with antibodies to – probably – H5N1, but not so sure as to exactly what strain/genotype.
      And, experimental ducks; but shedding little when they recovered.

      >>> Again: it’s clearly hard to get wide spread of H5N1 amongst wild birds; it’s too lethal. (I know the European swans are scattered over wide area, but yet to see at any one place re massive deaths. [Caspian Sea???])
      Qinghai the prime case where many deaths, and there, no known survivors. [why so many deaths? was there culling?]

      Seems that for H5N1 itself to kill wild birds in numbers at any one place, need exceptional circumstances.
      – Perhaps considerable introduction of virus (at Qinghai, by poultry – perhaps manure into fishponds?).
      – also, birds packed together, maybe at a colony, as Qinghai.

      cf openbill storks in Thailand, which I think were killed during nesting season; I’ve seen them nesting in huge colony, where they go out to feed in rice fields. I believed a horrific situation could unfold.
      Yet, turned out only around 8 that died and confirmed to have H5N1. Again, virus kills fast, dies away fast.

      As to wintering/migrating waterbirds, Poyang is among examples of virus being very hard to spread amongst wild birds.
      Those very few ducks found, yet no mass deaths reported, despite tens of thousands of waterbirds including variety of duck species, geese, swans, cranes, gulls, avocets…

      Hong Kong another example. Tens of thousands of waterbirds pack into small bay each winter; a few cases of H5N1, but no spread. And where is H5N1 at the wetland? Birds can – supposedly – miraculously be reservoirs of this disease, carry it west to Europe; yet, it is not present at wetland here on south coast of China. (Not just because 2000 healthy birds tested there this winter proved negative; also no unusual deaths – and H5N1 is not given to lurking quietly in the wild.)

      Yes, songbirds dying of it, eg here in Hong Kong.
      But how they did they get infected? Here, quite possible all songbirds were from captivity – esp given main dates just around and after Chinese New Year.

      How to transmit the virus among songbirds, say?
      I can understand with waterfowl, especially grazers such as geese, some ducks, swans.
      But for many other birds will be harder to get and sustain transmission.

      – it doesn’t matter, then, that it can kill mesias etc, if they can’t readily catch and transmit it in the wild.

      Not surprisingly then, in Hong Kong, songbird deaths by H5N1 seem over. Now to crows/magpies.

      So yes, with crows and magpies dying in a few places, indeed appears scavengers are susceptible.
      But, if they don’t have something with H5N1 – like dead chickens – to scavenge, they won’t get H5N1.

      Birds of prey, too. Peregrines – 1 or 2, both from illegal captivity – in Hong Kong have died. As these are bird hunters, including ducks, should surely be resistant to flu, yet H5N1 kills them.

      >>>> Meanwhile, are indeed threats arising from action taken as a result of Fear of the Flu.
      If Russia indeed takes widespread measures to prevent birds nesting this spring/summer, could have serious impact on wild birds.
      Other impacts, too, which Nial and I have sent to you.

      Qinghai virus described as Z genotype in one of papers (Chen et al I think). Yes, it’s a distinguishable strain; one of several strains of Z known. [DM had for some reason alleged the strain spread westwards was not Z; later backtracked saying a distinguishable form of Z]

      Post edited by: martin, at: 2006/05/23 00:52

      Martin W

        Debora MacKenzie wrote of conspiracy notions by conservationists. Interesting, then, that New Sci publisher Reed Business Information has several farming titles, including Poultry World (this only over 4000 subscribers; but Farmers Weekly looks bigger):

        No reason, then, for DM to be other than balanced in assessing likelihood of wild birds or poultry as vectors … is there?

        Martin W

          Even as the connection between the H5N1 in Hungary and Bernard Matthews’ Suffolk farm became stronger, daft Debbie managed to concoct an extremely silly "investigative" piece in New Scientist. (What’s the matter with the mag? A former editor’s peddling a book on cosmic rays causing global warming.) Here are a few extracts, as Deborah MacKenzie turns bumbling detective to track down the source of the infection – without even leaving the office!

          Suspect: East Asia … Verdict: Extremely unlikely to have spread directly from here to the UK

          so far, so good ;)

          Suspect: Siberia Evidence: Dabbling ducks can carry H5N1 and stay healthy. [now get some guff re them having carried it on to Hungary and Britain: yes, Debbie’s a true Tooth Fairy Bird believer] … Verdict: Likely

          Debbie’s being, shall we say, economical with the truth here. A very few examples known of ducks staying "healthy" with H5N1 (not dying, anyway). Many known to die of it, too – note the Hungary virus killed geese. None known to be effective vectors – only circumstantial evidence at best.

          Suspect: Hungary … Verdict: Just because one happened after the other, it doesn’t mean the first one caused it.

          – there’s waffle from Debbie here, too. But, intriguing to see her dismiss the prime suspect so feebly.

          Suspect: Scotland Evidence: Britain’s only previous case of H5N1 was a dead whooper swan in a harbour in Cellardyke, Scotland, in March 2006. Could the virus have persisted in British birds? No other birds with H5N1 have been found in Britain, … Verdict: Likely. The same wild British ducks that infected the Scottish swan may have infected the Bernard Matthews turkeys. A worker could merely have stepped in duck faeces then walked into a barn, say scientists.

          Now, this is barking mad. There was no evidence the swan was infected in Britain – quite the contrary, given the swan was the only case found in the wild (and, Debbie, H5N1 does make its presence known when in the wild – get dead birds, and utter fancy to suggest it might persist in ducks that – magically – don’t infect birds that would die of H5N1, including other ducks of the same species). Instead, was even possible this bird was among those fleeing the cold snap in eastern Europe, and died over the sea. A sad fate, esp as maybe died of disease that evolved in poultry farms. Notice the "scientists" at the end: no proper attribution. You might expect such an article on a bonkers blog, but in New Scientist? Oh dear. If you like twaddle, you can read the article at: UK bird flu outbreak – who dunnit? Perhaps also take a look at New Sci publisher Reed International’s page on its publication

          Poultry World – which notes that

          today it focuses on large scale production and processing of poultry and eggs

          other publications include Farmer’s Weekly. Hmmm…

          Martin W

            New outbreak(s) of H5N1 on one or two poultry farms in UK, and – would you believe it!? – Deborah Mackenzie quick to suggest wild birds are responsible, despite not having shred of evidence:

            Redgrave Park farm is located very close to a large ornamental lake
            used by wild birds, and is 4 km from a wetlands nature reserve.

            The reserve, England’s largest remaining river fen, is
            internationally protected under the RAMSAR treaty on wetlands and
            home to several endangered species. It also harbors several species
            of dabbling duck, which would have flown into the area from breeding
            grounds in Siberia over the past 2 months.

            Autumn is when the ducks, which can carry H5N1 with no symptoms, are
            most likely to be carrying bird flu. The UK’s 1st outbreak was also
            near a wetland reserve. Domestic ducks can also harbor the virus
            without showing signs.

            – good grief! Deb clearly lives in a bunker, away from scientific reports; referring to UK’s first outbreak and nearby wetland reserve, when reports blamed links in poultry trade to continental Europe, and bad biosecurity.

            Meanwhile, back in the real world, where leaping to conclusions isn’t so typical as at DB’s desk in the poultry and farming publications related New Sci, the Times is reporting:

            Imported day-old ducklings from the Netherlands are now being investigated as a possible route for the H5N1 avian flu virus arriving in Britain.

            The Times has learnt that Gressingham Foods received regular supplies of ducklings delivered by a Dutch exporter.

            Dutch duckling imports are at centre of bird flu inquiry


            Hi Martin, maybe interesting too: The actual outbreak in Al-Khari (Saudi Arabia). Location is 150 Km south of Riyadh. My investigations shows that it must be the AL-KHMEES SONS COMPANY Po Box 6929 11942 Al Kharj Saudi Arabia Poultry Company. Infected species: Chicken (not clar yet if broiler or egg-industry). First official statements (like in GB): "Wild- or migratory birds" as "most likely explaination". But there are neither wild nor migratory birds. Google maps sattelite photos shows only desert in this area.

            Re outbreaks in GB: There are some interesting movies on (especially "Biosecurity" related) : Christmas Turkeys Infected With Deadly Virus (will send you some pictures by mail in addition) Another topic: What the hell das this News fom bangladesh means: 

            [.. And though a permanent relationship between migratory birds and bird flu has yet to be proven beyond a doubt, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), "scientists are increasingly convinced that some migratory waterfowl are now carrying the H5N1 virus in its highly pathogenic form, sometimes over long distances, and introducing the virus to poultry flocks in areas that lie along their migratory routes" – all of which worries health officials in Bangladesh. ..] All the best, Werner

            Martin W

              “permanent relationship between migratory birds and bird flu has yet to be proven beyond a doubt”
              – in case of H5N1, evidence is powerfully to the contrary.

              Gotta wonder to what extent the “migratory birds did it” notion stays alive not because of science – which suggests otherwise – is due to corruption by poultry industry. Corruption of “science” itself; and perhaps even financial corruption.
              Seems a little akin to global warming scepticism; take away energy industry money, and much of this would evaporate.

            Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.