Tony wrote:

> You merely postulate the existence of H1N1 like everyone
> else but you cant prove scientifically that it even exists
> can you other than a virtual reality on your computer.

it’s hard to “prove” anything outside a strict logical system.
But this looks silly and I never saw it from serious scientists,
who, without exception, I assume, would also consider it absurd.

If H1N1 physically exists and it is not simply a theoretical abstraction (bogus or otherwise) then it should be fairly easy to identify, isolate from contaminants and thus prove scientifically – I do not know of anybody who has actually done that yet – do you?